WaPo Tries Pitting Donald Against Melania, Completely Misses One Huge Problem | The Gateway Pundit
The institution media have actually been scraping the underside of the barrel this election, of their determined seek for mud to fling at their arch-nemesis Donald Trump.
From the wailing and gnashing of tooth that ensued when Trump’s half-a-billion greenback bond was reduced to $175 million by the New York appellate court docket, to the pearl clutching over the willful misunderstanding of Trump’s “massacre” metaphor, the institution media sorts have been tying themselves in knots of their quest to smear Trump’s title.
And now, The Washington Post has elevated its contribution to this embarrassing enterprise by attempting to fabricate some battle between Trump and his spouse, Melania.
The Publish started the try proper within the title, which alleged that “Trump’s mother-in-law got here into the nation by a course of he derided.”
What precisely did The Publish imply by this headline?
Primarily based on an evaluation of immigration information launched on Monday, The Publish was in a position to monitor the steps by which Trump’s mother-in-law, Amalija Knavs, who died in January on the age of 78, got here into the nation.
The Publish reported that Knavs was in a position to enter the nation and ultimately turn into a citizen due to the family-based strategy of immigration which, the Publish famous, Trump publicly spoke out in opposition to and sought to overtake through the course of his presidency.
Which means, as The Publish defined, in keeping with United States regulation relationship again to 1965, residents can apply for his or her dad and mom or minor youngsters to return into the nation with no prolonged visa ready interval.
In line with the not too long ago launched information, Melania Trump did simply that for her dad and mom in 1997, after which once more when her dad and mom utilized for inexperienced playing cards in 2008. Authorized everlasting residency was granted on March 16, 2010. Knavs and her husband, Viktor, didn’t grew to become U.S. residents till Aug. 9, 2018.
Clearly, then, what The Publish tried to suggest was that, had Trump been president within the late 90’s or early 2000’s, then his in-laws may by no means have turn into residents and, due to this fact, Mr. and Mrs. Trump can’t be in concord with one another consequently.
What The Publish missed, nonetheless, was that Trump by no means had something in opposition to immigration in and of itself..
For one, if Trump and his spouse ever clashed over thse points, they presumably handled these points, and subsequently moved on from them, years in the past.
For one more, what Trump objected to, as president and as a presidential candidate, had been the unlawful strategies of immigration, and the breakdown of a course of that when labored, however now has been abused by unhealthy actors to permit unacceptable ranges of chain migration.
Trump, by way of the RAISE Act, wished to restrict this household sponsorship to spouses and minor youngsters, eradicating dad and mom from the quick monitor of sponsorship and instating a system that will prioritize expert employees.
As The Federalist defined on the time, had this act handed, it might have reformed U.S. immigration to comply with related programs that had been commonplace in international locations like Canada and Australia for years.
The purpose of the invoice was to not get rid of america’ immigration processes, however to reform them.
What The Publish failed to grasp was that Trump, and, certainly, conservatives normally, had been really pro-immigration.
As a substitute, conservatives’ stance on immigration has been to prioritize these immigrants that will be materially good for america, and who would actively profit American society.
After all, legit asylum requests didn’t fall below that stipulation, however general, that’s what differentiated the conservative place on immigration from that of the left.
These on the left have been actively advocating for permitting immigrants who’re actively dangerous to American society, because the tragic collection of murders and assaults of Americans has sadly demonstrated.
And that was what the Publish failed to grasp in its weak try to pit Trump and his spouse in opposition to one another.
Conservatives by no means hated immigration.
What Trump and conservatives hated was unlawful immigration.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.