Visitor publish by Jefferson Davis in Wisconsin
Madison – In what some are calling “catastrophic”, “nuclear” or “apocalyptic”, which at face-value and with the complicit media protection it might appear to be, a more in-depth take a look at the on the precise 235-page ruling of the liberal Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom (4-3) on the redrawing of legislative maps for the 2024 elections on December twenty second might present a distinct and presumably optimistic growth.
It’s obvious that democrats are prepared to do no matter it takes to have their method after they can’t win on the poll field or legislate their radical agenda by rewarding judicial candidates with their limitless assist who then seem to legislate from the bench in trade for his or her assist throughout campaigns.
The 235-page ruling oozes with numerous examples cited by the dissenting Justices (Zeigler, Bradley and Hagedorn) of this obvious quid-pro-quo association between the candidates and their liberal supporters with limitless assets.
This ruling additionally factors out the hypocrisy and energy seize of the 4 liberal justices who’re apparently prepared to utterly disregard the structure, settled case election legislation, to not legislate from the bench and avoiding any look of blatant partisanship.
Wisconsin misplaced a congressional seat (from 9 to eight) after the 2000 Federal Census as a result of adverse inhabitants adjustments.
These Legislative Maps have been used for the November 2022 elections.
There have been no appeals or court docket filings relating to this determination for practically 18 months till candidate Janet Protasiewicz, Justice Karofsky and Justice Dallet began making obvious overtures within the Johnson vs. WEC Case, at California fundraisers and or debates that Wisconsin’s Legislative Maps have been “unfair” and “rigged” and that they wanted a “contemporary look” to make them extra favorable for democrats as a substitute of republicans due to republicans’ gerrymandering the Legislative Maps.
Janet Protasiewicz was sworn into workplace on August 1, 2023, altering the make-up of the Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom from 4-3 lean conservative to 4-3 outright progressive liberalism ideology.
The democrats (citizen teams, the Governor’s Workplace and Democrat Legislators) immediately and or not directly instantly dropped an expedited lawsuit request to the Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom on August 2, 2023, requesting instant aid within the following methods involving the “unconstitutional” legislative maps as a result of “non-contiguous” districts:
- All 132 legislative districts must run for re-election in 2024 as a result of the 2022 elections have been illegitimate as a result of unconstitutional maps that lacked contiguity.
- 50 of the 99 Meeting Districts allegedly have contiguity points.
- 20 of the 33 Senate Districts allegedly have contiguity points.
- Expedite this ruling course of by avoiding the conventional authorized technique of circuit courts and appellate courts to fast-track approval by the Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom.
- Maps abuse gerrymandering by republicans.
- Separation of Powers violated by republicans.
- Maps should be fairer and extra equitable for the election of democrats in comparison with republicans.
The Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom issued an almost instant ruling on December 22, 2023, that Wisconsin’s Legislative Maps are unconstitutional as a result of contiguity points involving “islands” or “indifferent areas” in some Meeting Districts and that these “islands” and “indifferent areas” must instantly be addressed by the Legislature, the Governor’s Workplace, the Petitioners and Consultants.
The established timeframe and partial abstract of the rulings by the Courtroom involving the “contiguity” issues are as follows:
- Democrat petitioner’s request to order all legislators to run for re-election in 2024 is denied. Solely these Legislators up for re-election in 2024 should run.
- The 4 liberal justices counsel that if the Legislature “fixes” the contiguity points that they (Courtroom) received’t become involved.
- The 4 liberal justices denied petitioner’s declare (liberal democrats) of gerrymandering by republicans.
- The 4 liberal justices admit the Legislature is constitutionally required to attract the Legislative Maps.
- The 4 liberal justices order maps should adjust to state and federal election legal guidelines (Equal Safety Clause and Voting Rights Act of 1965).
- The 4 liberal justices will keep away from approving remedial maps that favor one political celebration.
- The 4 liberal justices will think about different conventional districting standards not within the US or Wisconsin Structure.
- The 4 liberal justices will hesitate to contemplate “least change” method despite the fact that it’s extensively and generally accepted throughout America to reduce confusion and disruption for electors whereas really addressing any issues involving Legislative Maps.
- The 4 liberal justices admit minor exceptions might come into play relating to the contiguity subject that will nonetheless contain “islands” and or “indifferent areas”.
- The 4 liberal justices order the Meeting Districts should abide by the inhabitants equality pointers (about 59,000 every district) with acceptable minor deviations as described the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) in 2021.
- The 4 liberal justices admit the Governor’s Workplace must log out on the Legislative Maps.
- The 4 liberal justices have applied a plan that may work concurrently whereas the Legislature considers what they may do.
- The 4 liberal justices have ordered the maps from all events to be submitted by January 12, 2024, with supporting arguments due by January 26, 2024.
- The 4 liberal justices have ordered experiences from the consultants to be submitted by February 1, 2024, with responses due by February 8, 2024.
- The 4 liberal justices have employed 2 “map masters” to help and oversee the method of the Legislative Maps in Professor Jonathan Cervas, Carnegie Mellon College in Pittsburgh (click on right here – Jonathan Cervas | Political Science, Carnegie Mellon University) and Professor Bernard Grofman, UC Irvine (click on right here – Bernard Grofman (uci.edu)).
- The 4 liberal justices will launch the maps in late February or early March 2024.
- WEC has requested new maps by March 15, 2024.
This ruling includes a variety of authorized communicate (i.e. judicial estoppel, prejudice, parts of laches, unreasonable delay, stare decisis, one man, one vote, and many others.), however none of that actually issues when an individual cuts by the deliberate smokescreen and fog. It’s simply noise in an obvious effort to distract, deceive and dilute the true cause for the ruling.
A evaluation of the so-called “municipal islands” or “indifferent areas” that the 4 liberal justices level to really prove to indicate that solely 5% of the roughly 200 municipal islands recognized by the 4 liberal justices within the Meeting Districts shouldn’t have any inhabitants in them. In the event that they do, it could be about 100 individuals and never all of them are sufficiently old to vote or are even registered to vote.
It’s hoped that the Republican managed Legislature will instantly put this silliness and obvious assault on our structure proper again into the laps of the progressive liberals who introduced the go well with and the Governor’s Workplace as ordered by the Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom to repair the contiguity subject in a few of these districts.
Realizing that democrats will likely be democrats, they may in all probability transfer the aim publish like Lucy all the time used to do to Charlie Brown.
It seems that this ruling by the Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom is popping out to be extra about who will get Wisconsin’s 10 Electoral School Votes and never the constitutionality of the Wisconsin’s Legislative Maps.
Democrats know there isn’t any pathway to the presidency in 2024 except it contains Wisconsin’s 10 Electoral School Votes.
Wisconsin allegedly processed 1.957 million +/- absentee ballots in the course of the 2020 Presidential Election with solely 4,270 of these ballots being rejected for lacking statutory required info or a .002% rejection price. The conventional accepted absentee poll rejection price is between 2%-3% throughout America throughout elections.
With all statewide precincts having reported their outcomes and with President Trump comfortably main by roughly 110,000 votes, the “lacking” flash drive was discovered at 3:26 A.M. with the non-tabulated absentee ballots.
In an 18-minute interval in the course of the wee-hours of the morning on November 4, 2020, President Trump went from comfortably being forward by roughly 130,000 votes when the “lacking” flash drive started its tabulation solely to study that when all the absentee ballots have been tabulated, that President Trump ended up being behind by 20,682 votes.
What can the typical individual do to assist repair the contiguity points that supposedly includes “municipal islands” or “indifferent areas”?
Please think about contacting your State Consultant and State Senator as follows to encourage them to get forward of this Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom Ruling that seems to be designed to doubtlessly heist Wisconsin’s 10 Electoral School Votes in 2024 earlier than it’s too late:
Wisconsin’s electors deserve higher than this fixed submitting of lawsuits when democrats don’t get their method.
Hopefully, the USA Supreme Courtroom doesn’t should become involved in, yet one more mess created by the democrats in Wisconsin, but when they should, so be it. This infantile and immature conduct by democrats must be positioned on the ash heap of historical past the place it belongs to protect and shield our constitutional consultant republic.