BREAKING: Court Rules Undated Ballots CANNOT BE COUNTED in Pennsylvania Elections – Sanity Prevails! | The Gateway Pundit
The Third US Circuit Court docket of Appeals on Wednesday dominated that mail-in ballots with no dates can’t be counted by Pennsylvania election officers.
Democrats use this tactic often so as to add extra ballots to their candidate’s totals following election day.
This stops the Democrat Occasion madness and lawlessness for now.
George Behizy reported:
BREAKING: The third U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals has dominated that mail-in ballots with no dates cannot be counted by Pennsylvania election officers
Democrats have been preventing so that each poll that confirmed up would depend… this ruling stops that madness pic.twitter.com/7I49zyCzZw
— George (@BehizyTweets) March 28, 2024
Your complete ruling is linked under.
Complete rulinghttps://t.co/Db1mJ7QvBd
— George (@BehizyTweets) March 28, 2024
NPR reported:
A federal appeals panel has arrange a possible U.S. Supreme Court docket battle about Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballots that would play a task in figuring out who wins this yr’s presidential election and different races in the important thing swing state.
Mailed ballots that arrive on time however in envelopes with out dates handwritten by Pennsylvania voters or with incorrect dates shouldn’t be counted, a three-judge panel of the third U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals dominated Wednesday. Their 2-1 resolution strikes down a decrease courtroom ruling.
The principle authorized concern surrounding what are sometimes referred to as “undated ballots” is whether or not not tallying them violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which says an individual’s proper to vote can’t be denied for “an error or omission” that’s “not materials” in figuring out voting eligibility.
A present, handwritten date on the return envelope is required by Pennsylvania state regulation, however that date will not be used to substantiate if an individual is eligible to vote. For previous elections, the ultimate vote tallies by county election officers have included ballots arriving in undated or misdated return envelopes.
Within the panel’s majority opinion, third U.S. Circuit Choose Thomas Ambro mentioned that what’s identified in authorized circles because the materiality provision “solely applies when the State is figuring out who might vote.”
“In different phrases, its function stops on the door of the voting place,” wrote Ambro, an appointee of former President Invoice Clinton, who was joined by Circuit Choose Cindy Chung, a Biden appointee. “The Provision doesn’t apply to guidelines, just like the date requirement, that govern how a professional voter should solid his poll for it to be counted.”