Eleni Kounalakis with Kamala Harris<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

California\u2019s Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis has reportedly urged the Secretary of State, Dr. Shirley N. Weber, to think about authorized avenues for excluding former President Donald Trump from California\u2019s 2024 presidential main poll.<\/p>\n

\n
JUST IN \u2013 California Lt. Gov. writes Secretary of State to \u201cdiscover each authorized possibility\u201d to take away Trump from the CA\u2019s 2024 poll \u2014 Politico<\/p>\n
\u2014 Disclose.television (@disclosetv) December 20, 2023<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
In a letter addressed to Secretary Weber, Lieutenant Governor Kounalakis references the current ruling from the Colorado Supreme Courtroom in Anderson v. Griswold<\/em>, which deemed former President Trump ineligible for Colorado\u2019s ballot<\/a>, citing his alleged function in inciting the January 6, 2021, \u201crevolt\u201d on the U.S. Capitol.<\/p>\n
It must be famous that Trump has not been charged with partaking in revolt or riot towards the US. Trump informed his supporters to be PEACEFUL!<\/p>\n
\u201cThis choice is about honoring the rule of legislation in our nation and defending the elemental pillars of our democracy,\u201d Kounalakis acknowledged in her letter. She emphasised that the Colorado ruling ought to function a precedent for California to comply with.<\/p>\n
The far-left Colorado Supreme Courtroom, in its unconstitutional ruling, held that underneath part three of the Fourteenth Modification, Trump\u2019s actions through the revolt disqualify him from standing for presidential re-election. Referencing conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch\u2019s opinion in Hassan, the courtroom underscored the state\u2019s proper to exclude from the poll candidates who’re constitutionally prohibited from assuming workplace.<\/p>\n
Lt. Governor Kounalakis\u2019s letter implores California to \u201cstand on the proper facet of historical past\u201d and to find out Trump\u2019s eligibility for the California poll primarily based on the explanations outlined within the Anderson case.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe structure is obvious: you have to be 40 years previous and never be an insurrectionist,\u201d the letter concludes.<\/p>\n
Learn the total letter:<\/p>\n
\n
Primarily based on the Colorado Supreme Courtroom\u2019s ruling in Anderson v. Griswold (2023 CO 63), I urge you to discover each authorized choice to take away former President Donald Trump from California\u2019s 2024 presidential main poll.<\/p>\n
I’m prompted by the Colorado Supreme Courtroom\u2019s current ruling that former President Donald Trump is ineligible to seem on the state\u2019s poll as a Presidential Candidate resulting from his function in inciting an revolt within the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. This choice is about honoring the rule of legislation in our nation and defending the elemental pillars of our democracy.<\/p>\n
Particularly, the Colorado Supreme Courtroom held in Anderson v. Griswold (2023 CO 63) that Trump\u2019s revolt disqualifies him underneath part three of the Fourteenth Modification to face for presidential re-election. As a result of the candidate is ineligible, the courtroom dominated, it might be a<\/p>\n
\u201cwrongful act\u201d for the Colorado Secretary of State to checklist him as a candidate on that state\u2019s presidential main poll. Moreover, Colorado\u2019s Supreme Courtroom cites conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch to make their case, saying the next, \u201cAs then-Choose Gorsuch acknowledged in Hassan, it’s \u2018a state\u2019s legit curiosity in defending the integrity and sensible functioning of the political course of\u2019 that \u2018permits it to exclude from the poll candidates who’re constitutionally prohibited from assuming workplace.<\/p>\n
California should stand on the proper facet of historical past. California is obligated to find out if Trump is ineligible for the California poll for a similar causes described in Anderson. The Colorado choice might be the premise for the same choice right here in our state. The structure is obvious: you have to be 40 years previous and never be an insurrectionist.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n