Jamie Golombek: In nearly all circumstances, the taxpayer merely doesn’t meet the qualification standards or their proof strains credulity
Evaluations and suggestions are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made via hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Taxpayers present up in federal court docket nearly each week hoping to hold on to their COVID-19 benefits after being discovered ineligible by the Canada Revenue Agency, however they’re often unsuccessful.
In nearly all circumstances, the taxpayer merely doesn’t meet the qualification standards or their proof strains credulity. Earlier than delving into the main points of a current case, right here’s a fast refresher of the foundations.
Commercial 2
Article content material
The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and its substitute, the Canada Restoration Profit (CRB), had been the 2 predominant COVID-19 advantages obtainable to people. The CERB was provided for any four-week interval between March 15, 2020, and Oct. 3, 2020. To be eligible, an applicant needed to reveal they’d earnings of at the very least $5,000 from (self-)employment earnings in 2019 or within the 12 months previous their first software.
The CERB was changed by the CRB, which turned obtainable for any two-week interval between Sept. 27, 2020, and Oct. 23, 2021, for eligible workers and self-employed employees who suffered a lack of earnings as a result of pandemic.
CRB’s eligibility standards had been much like CERB in that they required, amongst different issues, that the person had earned at the very least $5,000 in (self-)employment earnings in 2019, 2020 or through the 12 months previous the date of their software.
The CERB and CRB advantages are mostly chosen for evaluate by the CRA when it’s unclear if the taxpayer earned at the very least $5,000 of earnings in a previous qualifying interval.
The commonest varieties of qualifying earnings are employment or self-employment (that’s, enterprise) earnings, however the CRA has accepted that non-eligible dividends (typically these paid out of company earnings taxed on the small enterprise fee) can depend in the direction of the minimal $5,000 in earnings required for eligibility since enterprise house owners have flexibility in how they pay themselves (wage or dividends).
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
It was the problem of dividends that turned an issue within the present case, which concerned a taxpayer who utilized for and acquired CERB advantages from March 15, 2020, to Sept. 26, 2020, and CRB advantages from Sept. 27, 2020, to the tip of October 2021.
The CRA concluded the taxpayer was not eligible for the advantages as a result of he didn’t earn at the very least $5,000 from employment or self-employment for 2019, 2020, 2021 (as relevant), or through the 12 months previous the date on which he submitted his functions.
The taxpayer disagreed and finally took the matter to Federal Courtroom, searching for a judicial evaluate of the CRA’s selections to disclaim him the advantages.
As with prior judicial evaluate circumstances, the function of the federal court docket is to not conclude whether or not or not the taxpayer was truly eligible for advantages, however quite to find out, in gentle of the proof and arguments that had been introduced to the CRA, whether or not the company’s resolution to disclaim the advantages was “cheap.”
Within the years previous to evaluate, the taxpayer ran a specialised publishing enterprise, primarily geared toward professionals and contractors within the architectural area. Throughout the pandemic, a paper scarcity had a major influence on his means to print, and numerous printing homes had been pressured to stop operations. He tried to transform his publication to a digital one in an effort to mitigate the results, however his revenues plummeted.
Commercial 4
Article content material
Though his enterprise had by no means been worthwhile save for one 12 months prior to now, the taxpayer claimed to have acquired $7,000 in dividends from his firm in 2020. On a private stage, the taxpayer additionally by no means declared any private earnings apart from the $7,000 in dividends declared for 2020. This $7,000 in dividends got here below CRA scrutiny resulting from a collection of financial institution transfers backwards and forwards between his registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP), himself and his company.
The taxpayer testified that he withdrew $10,000 from his RRSP in December 2019 with the plan to switch it to his enterprise checking account in an effort to “decrease his enterprise debt ratio … to make it eligible for a grant.”
In line with the financial institution statements he supplied, he transferred $10,000 from his private checking account on Jan. 4, 2020, to his company’s account. On the identical day, the company then transferred the $10,000 again to him. Three days later, he wrote a cheque for a similar quantity to his brother.
The corporate’s accounting information confirmed that the switch of $10,000 was thought-about a fee of $3,000 to his spouse for “writing,” and the $7,000 to the taxpayer was categorized merely as “Withdrawals – House owners.”
Commercial 5
Article content material
In his 2020 earnings tax return, the taxpayer reported this $7,000 as dividend earnings, however didn’t file a T5 slip from the corporate exhibiting the dividend. The company didn’t produce a 2020 T5 slip till Sept. 12, 2023, following requests from the CRA and its concern that the 2020 “dividend” was “problematic.”
The choose mentioned that below Canada’s self-reporting tax system, the onus is on the taxpayer to supply adequate proof to help their software for COVID-19 advantages, and the CRA is entitled to ask the taxpayer to supply extra paperwork or data to show their eligibility past a tax return.
That is supported by earlier jurisprudence, which has discovered that the CRA shouldn’t be required to solely depend on a tax return, however may take into account the proof as a complete, which can embody invoices and buyer fee receipts, in addition to data obtainable via the company’s inside information.
Based mostly on the sequence of transactions between the taxpayer’s private checking account and his enterprise account previous to the fee of the dividend, in addition to that the T5 slip was solely accomplished retroactively in September 2023 following a request from the CRA, the company felt the proof was “not sufficiently credible” to reveal that he had earned adequate earnings to fulfill the earnings eligibility requirement.
Commercial 6
Article content material
Advisable from Editorial
The choose agreed, concluding that the CRA’s selections to disclaim the advantages had been “cheap and justified given the entire proof on report.”
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
For those who favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s essential to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.
Article content material