In a city corridor interview with Oprah Winfrey, Kamala Harris’ long-standing hypocrisy on gun management was uncovered for all to see.
Kamala, identified for her anti-gun rhetoric, let slip that not solely is she a gun proprietor, however she would use it to shoot intruders in the event that they dared to interrupt into her residence.
For somebody who has championed stricter gun legal guidelines and even floated the concept of obligatory buybacks, this unscripted second laid naked her duplicity.
When pressed throughout her interview with Oprah, she dropped the bombshell that she and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz each personal weapons.
“I’m a gun proprietor. Tim Walz is a gun proprietor,” mentioned Kamala, a lot to Oprah’s shock.
“I didn’t know that,” Oprah mentioned.
However the true jaw-dropper got here subsequent. Harris, seemingly emboldened by the second, continued: “If any person breaks in my home, they’re getting shot.”
Harris, apparently realizing the gravity of her phrases, laughed nervously and backpedaled, including, “I ought to haven’t mentioned that. My workers will take care of that later.”
The hypocrisy is evident. Here’s a lady who has championed gun management measures for years, pushing for an assault weapons ban, obligatory gun buyback packages, and tighter restrictions on law-abiding gun house owners—but she is fast to confess she would use her firearm for self-defense.
WATCH:
KAMALA: “If any person breaks into my home, they’re getting shot. Ha ha ha! Sorry, in all probability shouldn’t have mentioned that! Ha ha ha! However my workers will take care of that later. Ha ha ha!” pic.twitter.com/uAIJpSgl4N
— Trump Struggle Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 20, 2024
In the course of the recent presidential debate, Trump rightfully identified Harris’s gun-grabbing agenda, warning that she would come after Individuals’ Second Modification rights.
Harris tried to deflect the accusation, claiming, “Tim Walz and I are each gun house owners. We’re not taking anyone’s weapons away, so cease with the continual mendacity about these items.”
For a lot of, Harris’s sudden revelation about proudly owning a gun, adopted by her admission that she would shoot an intruder, is the last word instance of liberal hypocrisy. How can somebody so vehemently advocate for gun management whereas concurrently having fun with the safety of a firearm?
Her feedback on dwell tv additional solidified the notion that Kamala Harris’s stance on weapons is as inconsistent as her political rhetoric. Simply days after the talk, the place she insisted nobody’s weapons could be taken away, Harris has returned to calling for an “assault weapons” ban and common background checks. She insists that “cheap gun security legal guidelines” don’t contradict her assist for the Second Modification.
“I really feel very strongly that it’s in step with the Second Modification and your proper to personal a gun to additionally say we want an assault weapons ban,” Harris said in the course of the interview. “They’re actually instruments of conflict,” she added, persevering with her push for stricter laws.
So which is it, Kamala? Are you the gun proprietor able to defend your property by power, or the crusader for disarming Individuals within the identify of “security”? It looks as if Harris needs to have it each methods—having fun with the safety of her personal firearm whereas working to make sure others don’t have the identical proper.