Sony is not any stranger to producing impressively small full-frame cameras. The original A7C took the innards of the bigger A7 collection and stuffed them in a extra compact physique. The ZV-E1 went additional, with a tiny physique that appears positively comical connected to lengthy lenses.
These smaller our bodies all the time contain function compromises. Nobody needs a heavy digicam, however some options imply bodily limitations. Whereas the sensors stands out as the identical, the viewfinders are smaller, and different options have been generally absent.
Enter the brand new Sony A7C R. In my expertise testing it for a number of weeks in North Carolina’s Outer Banks, it comes closest to offering the whole lot you want in a digicam and nothing you do not. The impressively small physique is however snug to carry and carry round all day, and has a lot of the options even a professional would need.
All Issues Nice and Small
Two years in the past, I examined the unique Sony A7C and located that whereas the compact, rangefinder-style physique was good for touring, the viewfinder was too small and the 24.2-MP sensor was a step again from the 40-MP sensor in my Sony A7RII. It was tantalizingly near the whole lot I needed, however not fairly there.
The A7C R solves at the least the sensor drawback, and will get a lot nearer to the best journey digicam. It is nonetheless a lot small at 4.9 inches huge, 2.8 inches tall, and a pair of.5 inches deep. It weighs slightly below a pound at 15.2 ounces (430 grams) for the physique. With the FE 28-60mm F4-5.6 lens Sony despatched alongside for testing, the full weight got here to 21.1 ounces.
The 61-MP CMOS sensor within the new A7C R is similar sensor you may discover in Sony’s A7R V, launched a number of months earlier than the A7C R. It is top-of-the-line sensors I’ve examined, able to glorious element, with nice dynamic vary. The low-light efficiency is spectacular as nicely, with little or no noise even nicely up into the five-digit ISO choices (the A7C R can shoot all the best way as much as ISO 102,400, however as you’d anticipate, these photographs are very noisy).
There’s nothing about this sensor that I can assume to complain about. It is improbable. The ensuing RAW information are giant—round 65 MB per picture in my testing, with low gentle photographs being the biggest. You will get this right down to round 45 MB per picture for those who go for compressed RAW, however on the time I used to be testing, no software program might open these information (Lightroom and others have since added help).