Jamie Golombek: Taxpayer on the hook for fantastic for improperly transferring contributions from one financial institution to a different
Evaluations and suggestions are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by way of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
I obtained my 2023 Discover of Evaluation this week and it contained the total particulars of my tax evaluation, an evidence of adjustments and different vital data, together with a one-page detailed registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP) deduction restrict and obtainable contribution room assertion. What it didn’t comprise, nevertheless, was an analogous assertion about my obtainable tax-free savings account (TFSA) contribution room.
Commercial 2
Article content material
For this, you might want to go browsing to the Canada Revenue Agency’s portal, My Account or telephone the tax data telephone service (TIPS) at 1-800-267-6999. Assuming you could have the endurance to carry (wait instances this week have been 1.5 to 2 hours), you may ask an agent for a TFSA Room Assertion and a TFSA Transaction Abstract, which present the knowledge the CRA has obtained out of your TFSA issuers about your contributions and withdrawals.
Article content material
Annually, all TFSA issuers are required to electronically submit a TFSA document to the CRA for every particular person who has a TFSA. Issuers should submit this data by the final day of February of the next yr, and report all TFSA transactions you made on or earlier than Dec. 31 of the prior yr.
It’s vital, nevertheless, to match the TFSA transaction data the CRA has with your personal information to make sure the knowledge they’ve is appropriate and updated. It’s attainable that whenever you look on-line, particularly within the first few months of the yr, the CRA might not but have obtained and processed the earlier yr’s transactions, that means they’re not but mirrored within the TFSA quantities proven on-line. This might result in an overcontribution.
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The penalty for overcontributing is the same as one per cent per 30 days for every month you’re over your restrict. Should you get assessed a TFSA penalty tax, you may request the CRA to waive or cancel it, which the company has the ability to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an inexpensive error,” and the overcontribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “at once.”
If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you may take the matter to Federal Court docket, the place a choose will decide whether or not the CRA’s choice to not waive the tax was “cheap.”
The newest choice involving a TFSA overcontribution, determined in April 2024, involved a taxpayer who went about transferring his TFSA from one monetary establishment to a different within the incorrect approach.
The taxpayer had no less than two TFSA accounts. In the beginning of 2020, his unused TFSA room was $6,270. He contributed a complete of $46,000 in 2020, and so he exceeded his restrict by $39,730 and was consequently assessed a penalty tax.
The supply of his overcontributions may very well be traced again to the taxpayer’s actions in early 2020. On Feb. 4, 2020, he withdrew $20,000 from his Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec TFSA account, and deposited it the subsequent day into his Nationwide Financial institution TFSA account.
Commercial 4
Article content material
He did the identical factor once more the next month, when on March 9, 2020, he withdrew one other $20,000 from his Desjardins TFSA account, solely to deposit it the subsequent day into his Nationwide Financial institution of Canada TFSA. He had additionally deposited one other $6,000 into his TFSA account in early 2020, so his complete 2020 TFSA contributions have been $46,000, however he solely had $6,270 in unused room.
In July 2021, the taxpayer obtained a discover from the CRA advising him that he had exceeded his TFSA contribution restrict in 2020, and telling him he needed to pay $2,166 in penalty tax on his extra contributions for 2020.
In October 2021, the taxpayer despatched a letter to the CRA requesting that it cancel the tax on his extra TFSA contributions. In March 2022, the CRA wrote to him denying his request, saying it may solely accomplish that if the contributions have been made on account of a “cheap error,” and the person instantly took steps to withdraw them from the TFSA, which was not the case right here.
Following this refusal, the taxpayer filed a second software in April 2022 for the cancellation of the tax. In June 2022, the CRA once more denied his request “as a result of the transfers of funds made in 2020 from one TFSA account to a different TFSA account weren’t ‘direct transfers’ for the reason that transfers weren’t made by the monetary establishment.” The consequence was that these transfers have been thought of to be common contributions, placing the taxpayer in an overcontribution scenario.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The taxpayer appealed this choice to the Federal Court docket. He argued that “he (had) acted in good religion in transferring funds from one TFSA account to a different.” However the CRA maintained that the taxpayer’s error on this case was not a “cheap error” as a result of he admitted he had not made his transfers within the method prescribed by the CRA (by asking his monetary establishment to take action instantly) since he was unaware of the duty to take action. Within the CRA’s view, its train of discretion to waive the penalty tax wouldn’t be applicable within the circumstances.
The choose reviewed the arguments after which cited numerous prior circumstances coping with comparable eventualities during which it was held that it was as much as the taxpayer to know the TFSA guidelines, together with tips on how to property switch funds “instantly” from one TFSA to a different.
It will probably’t merely be completed by way of a withdrawal and subsequent deposit, however have to be completed instantly by the monetary establishment. In all these circumstances, the courts have persistently held that the CRA’s refusal to deal with such errors as “cheap errors” (which might permit the CRA to waive the tax), was, itself, cheap.
Commercial 6
Article content material
The choose finally expressed sympathy for the taxpayer, however stated he was “certain by the jurisprudence and ideas recognized by my colleagues. My function is to not rule on the deserves, however to evaluate whether or not the (CRA’s) choice is affordable, figuring out whether or not it’s intelligible, clear and justified.” The choose concluded that it was, and dismissed the taxpayer’s case.
Really useful from Editorial
Whereas the CRA sought prices, the choose refused to award the company something owing to the unlucky circumstances of the case.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
Should you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you might want to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.
Article content material